Home / Guides / Storm shelter door standards

Storm shelter door standards: what a tested assembly actually means

Researchers fired a 15-pound board at seven shelter doors at 100 mph. Six of them failed. The one that held was the only door built and tested as a shelter door from the start — and the attempts to reinforce the others did not save them.

Every part of a storm shelter is tested against the same debris. Only one part routinely fails: the door. That is not a marketing claim, it is the finding of a test program run at the Texas Tech University National Wind Institute with the National Storm Shelter Association, in which six of seven above-ground shelter doors failed the tornado impact test and the only one that passed was the purpose-built, previously tested assembly. The rule that follows from it governs everything on this page: a shelter door is not a product, it is an assembly — leaf, frame, hinges, hinge screws, latching hardware and frame anchorage, tested together, in the configuration it will be installed in. We do not sell shelters or doors and take no installer commissions. Every figure below is sourced.

The short answer
A compliant tornado shelter door is an assembly tested and labeled to ICC 500, the standard the building code and FEMA P-320/P-361 reference. It has to hold the design pressure — multiple loads of at least 302 psf for a tornado shelter — and survive three impacts from a 15-pound 2x4 at 100 mph aimed at its most vulnerable points, with no perforation of the safe side, under 3 inches of permanent deflection, and at least two locking points still engaged afterward. The door leaf, frame, hinges and latching hardware are tested as one unit: substitute any of them and the test report no longer describes what is on your property. There is no such thing as a “FEMA-approved” door — FEMA says so itself, and says firms may not use the phrase.

Why does the door decide whether the shelter works?

Because it is the only moving part in a structure whose entire job is not to move.

Walls and roof panels on a compliant shelter are continuous, anchored and massive. The door is a hole in that envelope, closed by a leaf that has to open, with hinges on one edge and latches on the other, and each of those is a discrete point that a single piece of flying lumber can break. The Texas Tech report puts the risk to the owner in one sentence: “the door assembly in their Tornado Shelter is potentially the weakest portion of the shelter.”

The published test protocol concedes the same thing from the engineering side. It allows a door to finish the test with one lock or one hinge destroyed, noting plainly that one missile can disable one lock or one hinge — which is exactly why it requires that at least two locking points remain engaged when the test is over. The standard is not assuming the door comes through undamaged. It is requiring that the door stay shut while being damaged.

This is also the component that fails over time. FEMA's maintenance guidance cites a study of 289 community shelter doors aged 10 to 17 years in which roughly 75 percent had problems that could have caused failure in a tornado — covered in our maintenance checklist. A tested door is not a permanent condition.

What does “tested assembly” actually mean?

It means the certificate covers a specific list of parts bolted together a specific way, and nothing else.

FEMA's fact sheet on residential tornado safe room doors states the requirement directly: the entire assembly — door, hardware, frame and anchors — must pass testing in the exact configuration it will be installed in. UL Solutions, which tests and certifies these assemblies, describes the same scope from the laboratory side: the door leaf, vision panel, frame, attachment methods and hardware are tested together, using the same materials and construction as the proposed product, and installation into the rough opening is itself critical. The published impact protocol spells out what pass or fail covers: the door, locking hardware, hinges, hinge screws and the frame, with the frame attachment connectors limited to shear strengths at or below what is commonly specified for the real installation.

Three practical consequences, in descending order of how often they are ignored:

  • Swapping hardware voids the result. FEMA warns that substituting untested hardware, or using a door and frame without the tested hardware, may cause the door to fail in a tornado. A cheaper latch set on the same leaf is a different assembly.
  • The anchorage is part of the product. The attachment devices that tie the frame into the surrounding wall are inside the tested scope, and the manufacturer's installation instructions are written per wall type — wood-frame construction and concrete masonry are not interchangeable details.
  • The opening matters. A tested assembly set into an out-of-square, under-reinforced or wrong-material opening has left the configuration that was tested, and no report covers it.

ICC 500 also tightened the specimen rules over its editions. The 2008 edition tested only the maximum door size; ICC 500-2014 requires testing of both the minimum and maximum sizes, limits the bottom undercut to three-quarters of an inch, requires a weather seal on exposed doors, and adds anchorage and inspection provisions. Which edition applies to you depends on your local code: the 2015 IBC references ICC 500-2014, and the 2021 IBC references ICC 500-2020.

What exactly does the door have to survive?

Two tests, in sequence, and the second one is the one that eliminates products.

RequirementTornado shelter door
Missile15-pound sawn-lumber 2x4, fired along its long axis, striking perpendicular to the test face
Impact speed, vertical surfaces (walls, doors)Minimum 100 mph
Impact speed, horizontal surfaces (roofs, hatches)67 mph — two-thirds of the vertical speed
Number of impactsAt least three, aimed at the locations judged most vulnerable — latches, hinges, corners — not the middle of the leaf
PerforationThe missile may penetrate the outer face but may not perforate the safe side
DeflectionPermanent deflection after impact less than 3 inches
FragmentsNo spalled or delaminated segment may extend 3 inches or more into the safe compartment; nothing may be ejected into it
Locking pointsAt least two must remain engaged. If the door has only two, both must remain engaged and locked. The door need not be operable afterward
PressureStatic and cyclic loads per the design pressure; for a tornado shelter, multiple loads of at least 302 psf, tested per ASTM E330, with no permanent deformation over 3 inches
Scope of pass/failDoor, locking hardware, hinges, hinge screws and frame — as one assembly
Hurricane doors, for contrastA lighter 9-pound 2x4 at speeds set as a fraction of design wind speed — a materially easier test. A hurricane-rated door is not a tornado-rated door

In the United States this testing is commonly performed at the Debris Impact Test Facility of the National Wind Institute at Texas Tech University, whose published protocols cover each standard; the tornado case is Protocol 4. Testing may also be done by other accredited laboratories, and FEMA's position is that the manufacturer certifies the product to ICC 500 on the strength of an accredited lab's report. The report has to give a code official enough information to determine compliance.

For intuition on the impact: a 15-pound object at 100 mph carries roughly 5,000 foot-pounds of kinetic energy (our arithmetic from the stated mass and velocity, not a published figure). Three of those, into the hinge side and the lock side of a door that has to stay in its frame.

What happened when researchers tested doors that were never certified?

This is the most useful piece of evidence a shelter buyer can read, and it exists because somebody died.

The project was prompted by the April 27, 2014 death in Mayflower, Arkansas, where a shelter door failed under debris impact. Larry J. Tanner and Ernst W. Kiesling at the Texas Tech National Wind Institute, in work sponsored with the NSSA, bought seven above-ground door assemblies and ran them through the real protocol:

  • Series 1 and 2 — the least expensive doors, sold at big-box home improvement stores.
  • Series 3 through 6 — hollow metal doors sold as stock items through commercial door dealers.
  • Series 7 — a complying, tornado-tested assembly, available only by special order and the most expensive of the group. The benchmark.

The pressure test came first, at 1.512 psi held for 10 seconds (derived from a 250 mph ground speed, ASCE 7-10, a corner zone, a 10-foot wall height and the 1.2 safety factor ICC 500 applies). Five of the seven passed. Series 1 failed at 1.20 psi: the frame cracked along the lock line, the deadbolts bent past the strikes, and the hinge jamb split, releasing the door and half the jamb. Series 2 failed at 0.90 psi when the bottom two deadbolts bent and withdrew from their strike boxes.

Then the impact test — three shots, 15-pound 2x4, 100 mph. One of the seven passed: Series 7, the purpose-built tested assembly, whose faces deformed but which stayed locked and was never perforated.

DoorWhat it wasPressureImpact result
Series 1Big-box retailFailed at 1.20 psiKnocked out of its frame and hinges on the first impact, then twisted 180 degrees
Series 2Big-box retailFailed at 0.90 psiEvery impact perforated the door; one struck the center hinge
Series 3Stock commercial hollow metalPassedTwo impacts destroyed the top two locks; the top corner folded and separated from the frame
Series 4Stock commercial hollow metalPassedTop corner folded 12.5 in, face sheets separated 40 in, deadbolts withdrawn
Series 5Stock HM + steel crossbar (mitigated)PassedTop crossbar ejected; top corner folded 4.75 in
Series 6Stock HM + heavier crossbar (mitigated)PassedTop crossbar and top lock ejected
Series 7Tested shelter assemblyPassedPassed. Faces deformed; door stayed locked, not perforated

Read the middle of that table carefully, because it contains the trap. Series 3 through 6 all passed the pressure test. A seller could truthfully say those doors withstood the design pressure for a 250 mph shelter. All four were then destroyed by three pieces of lumber. Pressure performance is not debris performance, and a quote that cites one without the other is not telling you what you need to know.

Can I reinforce an ordinary steel door instead?

The researchers tried, deliberately, and published the answer.

Series 5 and 6 were the mitigation experiment: stock commercial hollow metal doors fitted with steel crossbars, the upgrade a handy owner or a cost-conscious contractor would reach for. The lighter bar with safety pins outperformed the heavier bar, and the team omitted safety pins on one version on the reasoning that a panicked occupant would overlook them. Neither mitigated door passed. The crossbars were ejected.

The report's own conclusions
“No dependable mitigation strategies were found.” Stock commercial hollow metal doors “cannot be safely and practically mitigated by using crossbars.” And the line to carry into any sales conversation: “the only dependable safe room door is a specifically manufactured and tested assembly.” The authors went further and recommended that non-tornado doors be labeled “Not for Use in Tornado Shelters.” No such labeling requirement exists, which is precisely why the burden of asking falls on the buyer.

FEMA's guidance is consistent with this and adds the warning that matters for anyone pricing by tier: a standard steel door with three locks and three hinges does not provide tornado protection; non-tested “storm door” assemblies are not safe room doors; and good/better/best rating language on cheaper doors gives a false sense of security. Ordinary steel doors have failed under windborne debris and have caused serious injuries and deaths.

What does the label and paperwork actually say?

ICC 500 requires impact-protective opening systems to be labeled. Per UL Solutions, the label carries:

  • the product category — for example, “Swinging Door for Use in Windstorm-rated Assembly”;
  • the standards the assembly was evaluated to;
  • and, as applicable, the test pressure and the 2x4 missile impact speed it was tested at.

That last item is the one to read. A label naming a 9-pound missile, or an impact speed well under 100 mph, is a hurricane or general windstorm rating, not a tornado shelter rating. The two live on similar-looking labels.

The label is a summary. Ask for three documents behind it: the test report naming the exact model and the hardware tested; the certification or listing documentation showing ICC 500 compliance from an accredited lab; and the installation instructions with the frame anchorage detail for your wall type. FEMA's own instruction to buyers is to request a test certification document or listing label showing ICC 500 testing, and to confirm that the hardware supplied is identical to the hardware used in testing.

If the shelter itself is from an NSSA producer member, there is a second paper trail: a registered engineer reviews the producer's design plans, specifications and impact test results and reports to NSSA; the producer attaches a numbered NSSA seal to each shelter after installation and files a Certificate of Installation, and NSSA keeps a record of each shelter's location and seal number. NSSA states the obvious corollary for everyone else — with a non-member you do not get that independent third-party engineering review, and the buyer carries the burden of confirming compliance. NSSA's own line on doors: “You never want to install or rely on any door or shelter that has not passed these tests.”

The phrase that does not exist
FEMA's fact sheet on residential safe room doors states that FEMA does not certify, approve, endorse or recommend products, contractors or firms, and that contractors and firms may not describe themselves or their products as “FEMA approved” or “FEMA certified.” FEMA publishes criteria. A door that is genuinely compliant has a lab report and a label to show you; a seller leaning on “FEMA approved” has told you which one they would rather talk about. Our myths page covers the rest of that family of claims.

Which way should it swing, and how do you get out?

Out, for a residential tornado shelter — and the test data is the reason. The Texas Tech report states that an out-swing door is significantly more resistant to debris impacts than an in-swinging one: an impact seats the leaf against the frame stop, so the frame shares the load instead of the latches carrying it alone. In-swing doors transfer that energy into the latch and hinge points, which is the failure mode the test table above is full of.

The cost of that choice is debris pile-up. A door that opens outward can be blocked by collapsed structure, which is why egress provisions are part of the standard rather than an afterthought:

  • Egress doors must be operable from inside without a key, special knowledge or special effort.
  • How many egress doors a shelter needs is driven by its normal-occupancy occupant load, not its shelter capacity. Where only one egress door is required, an emergency escape opening is also required — unless the occupant load is under 16, which covers essentially every residential shelter.
  • Doors serving an occupant load of 50 or more must swing in the direction of egress, and in assembly or educational occupancies at that load the latching hardware must be panic hardware. This is community-shelter territory, not a backyard unit.
  • Clear opening width, opening force, closing speed and threshold height follow ICC A117.1, and hardware must be operable without tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist — see our accessibility guide for what that means in a residential unit.

Practical version for a homeowner: keep a pry bar, work gloves and a charged light inside the shelter, know whether your unit has a secondary escape provision, and if it has a hatch rather than a swinging door, remember the roof-level impact criterion is 67 mph, not 100.

What about latching, and the hardware on the outside?

ICC 500-2020 handles this directly, and it is one of the more consequential changes between editions. Latches on envelope openings must either engage automatically when the door closes, with no means of disabling that action, or be engageable by an occupant. Latching mechanisms must be permanently mounted and must not require tools. Where the occupant is the one who throws the latch, instructional signage is required.

The 2020 edition also added Section 507: operable impact-protective-system hardware on the unprotected side of the envelope must be locked, disabled or inactive, so that a debris strike on an outside lever or handle cannot unlatch the door. It is a small clause describing a specific way people have died — a door that was closed, latched, and then opened by the storm.

One more edition note worth knowing if your shelter is in a commercial or institutional building: where ICC 500 requires fire separation for a community shelter, opening protectives have their own rules — 90-minute assemblies in 2-hour barriers, positive-latching hardware, listed components per most of NFPA 80, and fire-protective glazing in any vision light that also meets the ICC 500 impact criteria. Fire doors in barriers required only by ICC 500 Section 603.1 are not required to be self-closing.

Can I buy just the door and build the room myself?

You can buy a tested door assembly on its own, and for a site-built safe room that is what the FEMA P-320 drawings assume. But the limits are strict, and two of them catch people.

First, the frame anchorage is inside the tested assembly, and the installation instructions are written for a specific wall construction. A tested door whose detail assumes grouted concrete masonry does not become compliant when it is screwed into a stud wall. Second, the enclosure has to independently meet the same criteria — walls, roof, slab and anchorage all designed to ICC 500 at the governing design wind speed, which for a FEMA-funded residential safe room is 250 mph regardless of location. Our guide on what wind speed a shelter withstands covers how that number is set and where ICC 500 permits a lower zone speed.

A certified door on a reinforced closet that was never engineered is the worst of both purchases: real money spent on the one component that was already least likely to be the failure point in a non-compliant room. And it is a configuration no test report describes, which also means no rebate program or code official will treat it as a shelter. Permits and inspections are enforced locally — see permits and 911 registration.

What should I ask before I sign?

  1. “Can I see the debris impact test report for this exact door model?” Not a certificate, not a logo, not a brochure page. The report, showing the 15-pound 2x4 at a minimum of 100 mph, at least three impacts, no perforation of the safe side, deflection under 3 inches, and two locking points still engaged.
  2. “Is the hardware you are installing the hardware in that report?” Hinges, hinge screws, latch set, frame. Ask whether anything has been substituted since testing, and get the answer in writing on the quote.
  3. “What was the test pressure, and what was the missile speed?” Both numbers, separately. A pressure-only pass tells you nothing about debris — four doors in the Texas Tech series proved that. A 9-pound missile means hurricane, not tornado.
  4. “What is the frame anchorage detail for my wall?” Wood frame and masonry are different details, and the anchorage is part of what was tested. Ask who inspects it after install.
  5. “Does the latch engage automatically when the door closes?” If not, where is the required instructional signage, and is any exterior hardware locked out per Section 507?
  6. “If the door is blocked by debris, how do we get out?” A real answer, specific to the unit, not “that never happens.”
  7. “Who seals or labels this, and can I see the label before you leave?” ICC 500 requires the opening system to be labeled; an NSSA producer member also attaches a numbered seal and files a Certificate of Installation.
The money question, honestly
Series 7 — the only door that passed — was also the most expensive in the group and available only by special order. That is the actual trade-off this page describes, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest: a tested assembly costs meaningfully more than a stock commercial hollow metal door and several times a big-box steel door. The test results are the argument for paying it. If the budget does not reach a tested assembly, the honest options are a smaller tested unit, the off-season pricing window in our timing guide, a state rebate in our rebate index, or the financing routes in our financing guide — not a cheaper door on the same shelter.

The one-line version

A shelter door is only as good as the assembly on its test report: three impacts from a 15-pound 2x4 at 100 mph, no perforation, two locking points still engaged, and every hinge, screw, latch and anchor exactly as tested. Six of seven doors put through that test failed, crossbar reinforcement failed with them, and “FEMA-approved” is not a thing. Ask for the report, check the missile speed on the label, and match the anchorage to your wall.

Sources

Larry J. Tanner and Ernst W. Kiesling, Pressure and Impact Test Performance of Above-Ground Non-Complying Tornado Shelter Doors — Texas Tech University National Wind Institute Debris Impact Facility, sponsored with the National Storm Shelter Association. Primary source for the seven tested door assemblies and their sourcing (Series 1–2 big-box retail, Series 3–6 stock commercial hollow metal, Series 7 a complying tested assembly); the design pressure of 1.512 psi held for 10 seconds derived from a 250 mph ground speed, ASCE 7-10, corner zone, 10-ft wall height and the ICC 500 1.2 safety factor, tested per ASTM E330; the pressure results (five passed; Series 1 failed at 1.20 psi with the frame cracking along the lock line, deadbolts bending past the strikes and the hinge jamb splitting; Series 2 failed at 0.90 psi); the impact results of three 15-lb 2x4 impacts at 100 mph in which only Series 7 passed, including Series 1 being knocked from its frame and hinges on the first impact and twisting 180 degrees, Series 2 being perforated by every impact, Series 3 losing its top two locks, Series 4 folding 12.5 in with 40 in of face-sheet separation, and the ejection of the crossbars on mitigated Series 5 and 6; the April 27, 2014 Mayflower, Arkansas death from a failed shelter door that prompted the project; and the conclusions that no dependable mitigation strategies were found, that the only dependable safe room door is a specifically manufactured and tested assembly, that the door assembly is potentially the weakest portion of the shelter, that an out-swing door is significantly more resistant to debris impacts, that stock commercial hollow metal doors cannot be safely and practically mitigated by using crossbars, and the recommendation that non-tornado doors be labeled "Not for Use in Tornado Shelters." Texas Tech University National Wind Institute — Debris Impact Test Facility, Test Protocols. Primary source for Protocol 4, the tornado case: a 15-pound 2x4 travelling along its long axis and striking perpendicular to the test face, at 100 mph into vertical surfaces and 67 mph into horizontal surfaces (two-thirds of the horizontal speed); the Protocol 1–3 hurricane missile of 9 pounds at 34 mph or at fractions of design wind speed; the requirement of at least three missile impacts per test subject; the pass criteria that the missile may penetrate but may not perforate the safe side, that permanent deflection after impact must be less than 3 inches, that spalled or delaminated segments may not extend 3 inches or more into the safe compartment and that segments may not be ejected into it; the door provisions that at least two locking points must remain engaged after impact, that both must remain engaged where a door has only two, that the door need not be operable afterward, and the note that one missile can disable one lock or one hinge; and the scope of door pass/fail covering the door, locking hardware, hinges, hinge screws and frame, with frame attachment connector shear strength limited to what is commonly specified for the installation. FEMA — Residential Tornado Safe Room Doors Fact Sheet (Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration; copy hosted by the Georgia Emergency Management and Homeland Security Agency). Source for the statement that only door assemblies designed and tested to resist tornadoes can provide life-safety protection; that the entire assembly of door, hardware, frame and anchors must pass testing in the exact configuration it will be installed in; that testing is to ICC 500 to meet or exceed FEMA safe room criteria at a 250 mph design wind speed; that buyers should request a test certification document or listing label showing ICC 500 testing and confirm the supplied hardware is identical to the hardware tested; that attachment devices anchor the frame to the surrounding wall and installation instructions must match the wall type such as wood-frame or CMU; that FEMA does not certify, approve, endorse or recommend products, contractors or firms and that firms may not describe themselves or their products as "FEMA approved" or "FEMA certified"; that standard steel doors can fail from windborne debris and have caused serious injuries and deaths; that non-tested "storm door" assemblies are not safe room doors; that good/better/best rating language can give a false sense of security; that a steel door with three locks and three hinges does not provide tornado protection; and that substituting untested hardware or using a door and frame without the tested hardware may cause the door to fail in a tornado. FEMA published an updated edition of this fact sheet in November 2024. UL Solutions, The Code Authority — ICC 500 for Certified Protective Storm Shelters and Safe Rooms. Source for the laboratory view of the tested-assembly rule: the door leaf, vision panel, frame, attachment methods and hardware are tested together using the same materials and construction as the proposed product, and installation into the rough opening is critical; for the impact criteria of a 15-pound 2x4 up to 100 mph with no perforation of the interior surface, no failure of load-bearing fasteners, no excessive spall and no permanent deformation exceeding 3 inches; for static and cyclic pressure testing based on design pressure; for the ICC 500 requirement that impact-protective opening systems be labeled and for the label contents (product category such as "Swinging Door for Use in Windstorm-rated Assembly", the standards met, and as applicable the test pressure and 2x4 missile impact speed); for the statement that FEMA does not test, approve or certify products but requires manufacturers to certify to ICC 500 with testing by an accredited laboratory; and for the code context of IBC Section 423 and IRC Section R307. Lori Greene, AHC/CDC, FDAI, Decoded: Update on Storm Shelter Doors (iDigHardware). Source for the edition references (2015 IBC referencing ICC 500-2014 and 2021 IBC referencing ICC 500-2020); for the ICC 500-2014 changes limiting the bottom undercut to three-quarters of an inch, requiring a weather seal on exposed doors, adding anchorage and inspection provisions, and requiring testing of both minimum and maximum door sizes where the 2008 edition tested only the maximum; for the requirement that assemblies be tested and listed by a third-party agency and labeled as complying with ICC 500 performance requirements; for multiple pressure loads of at least 302 psf and multiple impacts from a 15-lb 2x4 at 100 mph aimed at critical locations; for the ICC 500 latching provisions requiring latches to engage automatically with no means of disabling or to be engageable by an occupant, to be permanently mounted and not require tools, with instructional signage where occupants engage the latch; for ICC 500-2020 Section 507 requiring operable impact-protective-system hardware on the unprotected side to be locked, disabled or inactive to prevent unintentional unlatching from debris impact; for the egress provisions including operability from the inside without key, special knowledge or special effort, the emergency escape opening requirement where only one egress door is provided unless the occupant load is under 16, the direction-of-egress swing and panic hardware requirements at an occupant load of 50 or more, and the ICC A117.1 accessibility criteria; and for the fire-protection provisions for community shelters including 2-hour barriers with 90-minute opening protectives, NFPA 80 compliance and fire-protective glazing in vision lights. National Storm Shelter Association — Important Information for Homeowners. Source for the NSSA producer-member process: third-party review in which a registered engineer reviews the producer's design plans, specifications and impact test results and reports to NSSA; the numbered NSSA seal attached by the producer to each shelter after installation; the Certificate of Installation filed with NSSA and the record kept of each shelter's location and seal number; the instruction to look for impact testing results and registered engineering reports showing compliance with FEMA and ICC standards for any manufacturer including non-members, with the buyer responsible for confirming compliance; the absence of independent third-party engineering review with non-members; and the statement that you never want to install or rely on any door or shelter that has not passed these tests. National Storm Shelter Association — Storm Shelter Standards. Context for ICC 500 as the ICC/NSSA standard jointly developed with the International Code Council and for its relationship to the FEMA P-320 and FEMA P-361 guidance documents. CDF Distributors — Storm Shelter Door Requirements: FEMA 361 and ICC 500 Compliance Guide (commercial door distributor; cited for market practice, not as a standards authority). Corroborating source for the 15-lb 2x4 at 100 mph tornado missile versus the lighter 9-lb 2x4 at 34 mph hurricane missile under ASTM E1996 and TAS 201; for tornado shelter doors swinging outward so internal pressure seats the door closed; for vision panels generally not being used in tornado shelter doors; and for commonly specified construction on tested assemblies such as a minimum 14-gauge welded steel frame continuously anchored and grouted solid in masonry, multi-point latching that distributes load along the door edge, and continuous or three-plus heavy-weight butt hinges. These construction figures are market practice reported by a distributor rather than requirements stated in ICC 500. FEMA P-320 (April 2025), Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building or Installing a Safe Room for Your Home. The residential guidance a compliant one- or two-family safe room is built to, including the construction drawings that assume a separately purchased tested door assembly, and the source of the near-absolute protection objective referenced throughout this site.